LOST AND FOUND – THE FAT FACTS (Sydney Diet Heart Study)

Dr. Neville Wilson – 10 Feb 2013.

According to a recent report in the British Medical Journal new research has revealed “previously hidden data” that saturated fats may , after all, be the kind of fats that, contrary to conventional wisdom, promote heart health and prevent disease. (1)

While this “revelation” is not new to the forward thinking clinicians who have long challenged the traditional dogma about dietary fats, it may come as a blow to the national health and dietary bodies who repeatedly dispense public warnings to avoid saturated fats “because they raise cholesterol levels and cause heart disease”. (2)

Not only is such dietary advice contrary to the findings of critical science, it is also a major stumbling block for those who seek to make healthy dietary choices, but who unwittingly deny themselves the many health benefits of dietary saturated fats by following conventional advice.

 

PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGES:

The fearsome warnings about dietary cholesterol and saturated fats, imbedded in public health messages, has led to the widespread avoidance of  natural healthy dietary choices like butter, eggs, animal fats and tropical oils, and to the  increased consumption of the officially recommended alternatives, like poly-unsaturated fats and carbohydrate laden choices, camouflaged by “low fat” or “fat free” labelling.

The American Heart Association (AHA) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have promoted their anti-fat and anti-cholesterol policy for several decades,  successfully influencing bio-medical models  worldwide to echo their dietary dogma.

Their public portrayal of the “heart healthy” diet, as symbolized by the traditional Food Pyramid, involves the vilification of saturated fats, and the preferential  promotion of food choices high in poly-unsaturated fats and carbohydrates.

According to the Food Pyramid protocol, the foods to be avoided, or eaten “sparingly” are those allocated to the “top shelf “of the Pyramid, containing animal fats and tropical oils. (3)

 

NEW FINDINGS:

 

According to the BMJ report, new research has revealed that the purported  “heart healthy” fats may not be so healthy after all, and that the much maligned fats, derived from animals and tropical oils, may be the healthier choice.

In a review of clinical data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study (1966 – 1973), previously unavailable and recently released, a 74% increase in the risk of death from heart disease was observed in men who reduced their intake of saturated fats and increased their intake of omega-6 rich poly-unsaturated fats.

In the study, men in the control group were given no dietary advice, while those in the intervention group were instructed to replace dietary saturated fat with  omega 6 linoleic acid from safflower oil and poly-unsaturated margarine.

By so doing, the men in the intervention group increased their risk of death from all causes, coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease, without any evidence of benefit from omega 6 poly-unsaturated fats.

In 2010 researchers led by Dr. C. E. Ramsden assessed the previously acclaimed health benefits of omega 6 fats and found insufficient evidence to support the conventional wisdom of replacing dietary saturated fats with poly-unsaturated fats. (4).

These same researchers, in their recent review of emergent data (previously hidden ) from the Sydney Diet Heart Study,  confirmed their earlier findings, and stated that these findings “ could have important implications for worldwide dietary advice to substitute omega 6 linoleic acid, and poly-unsaturated fats in general, for saturated fatty acids.” (5).

 

HEART HEALTHY FATS:

The AHA promotes the preferential dietary intake of poly-unsaturated fats as it’s “heart healthy” alternative to saturated fats, on the grounds that saturated fats raise serum cholesterol levels and LDL levels, considered by the AHA to be risk factors for heart disease.

This advice ignores the fact that saturated fats actually raise HDL cholesterol,  and improve total cholesterol / HDL-C ratios with cardio-protective benefits, and that raised LDL levels are irrelevant without making a distinction between the harmless buoyant LDL (pattern A – non atherogenic) and small dense LDL particle numbers (pattern B – pro-atherogenic). (6).

Saturated fats also reduce serum levels of pro-atherogenic lipoprotein Lp(a), thereby conferring their cardio-protective properties to arteries. (7) (8) (9).

National Health bodies in Ireland, including the Irish Heart Foundation (IHF) and The Irish Nutrition & Dietetic Institute (INDI)  continue to promote the “low fat “ message without making the vital distinction between unhealthy, partially hydrogenated fats, high in pro-inflammatory omega 6, and heart-healthy saturated fats and health sustaining omega-3 fats.

Their website advice is to “follow the Food Pyramid and limit choices from the top shelf “, and to “choose low fat spreads instead of butter, to eat lean meat and to cut off visible fat from meat”. (10) (11).

This dietary advice, in line with AHA and USDA recommendations, will lead to the inevitable reductions of dietary fat required for the optimal absorption of essential fat-soluble vitamins, like vitamin D, A, K and E .

Furthermore, reductions in dietary saturated fat, in accordance with AHA policy,  have been shown to adversely affect the cardio-protective sub populations HDL2, thereby increasing the potential for cardiovascular disease. (12)

The conventional dietary warnings about saturated fats have been repeatedly voiced by leading HSE dieticians, and several high profile clinicians, through public media policy statements or in patient prescriptions, and efforts to challenge these perceptions and prescriptions have been either ignored or unsupported by the public and medical media.

Vindication for these fats, as important inclusions in a healthy diet, should now be given recognition, and the necessary revisions to national  dietary advice be made as a matter of urgency.

Once again, Ireland has an opportunity to take a lead, as it did in revisions of anti-tobacco policy, and to publicly reverse it’s current anti-fat policy.

The HFSS (high fat, salt, sugar) slogan is misleading and counter-productive, and should be replaced by slogans that make a clear distinction between saturated fats and unsaturated fats, and between the ubiquitous inflammatory omega 6 rich vegetable oils present in processed foods and spreads, and the heart healthy anti-inflammatory omega 3 fats.

The recent decisions by the IMB to terminate the reimbursement of heart healthy omega 3 nutrients (Omacor) for deserving patients is likely to compromise their dietary intake of omega 3 fish oils, and tilt their omega 3 / omega 6 balance in favour of the latter, thereby increasing the potential for inflammatory disorders of the heart, lungs and central nervous system.

The low fat message has failed the test of time, and recently recovered clinical data has reinforced, not only,  the heart healthy benefits of dietary saturated fats, but also the importance of revising current dietary advice, which is contradicted, not only by the emergent evidence, but by half a century of clinical evidence that has either been hidden or ignored.

 

Dr. Neville Wilson. The Leinster Clinic. Maynooth, IRELAND.

 

REFERENCES:

 

  1. BMJ 5 Feb, 2013.
  2. www.heart.org / HEARTORG /Diet.
  3. www.usda.gov
  4. B J Nutr 2010; 104: 1586-6000
  5. BMJ 2013; 346: e8707, Ramsden, C E.
  6. JAMA 1998; 260: 1917- 1921
  7. Athero, Thromb & Vasc Biol 1998, 18: 441-449. Ginsberg
  8. Athero Thromb & Vasc Biol 24(2004), p  498 – 503.
  9. Athero, Thromb & Vasc Biol 24(2004), p 498 – 503.
  10. www.irishheart.ie
  11. www.indi.ie
  12. May Clin Proc 2003,78:1331-1336.

 

000000

THE RISE AND FALL OF TREDAPTIVE

by Dr. Neville Wilson

30 Jan 2013

 

Tredaptive was introduced into the European drug market on 3rd July 2008, as a pharmaceutical formulation designed to treat certain forms of mixed  dyslipidaemia in patients judged to be at risk of cardiovascular disease.

On the basis of well established cardiovascular benefits of nicotinic acid, Merck Sharp & Dohne Ltd. (MSD) formulated and marketed a combination of nicotinic acid (1000mg) and laropiprant (20mg), a prostaglandin (DP1) antagonist, selected for its anti-flushing property, an unwanted, yet harmless, adverse effect of nicotinic acid in some patients.

In combination, nicotinic acid and laropiprant (Rx TREDAPTIVE) achieved desirable lipoprotein ratios in dyslipidaemic patients, by raising HDL-C levels and lowering Triglyceride (Tg) levels in patients who were estimated to be at risk of cardiovascular disease.

 

HPS2-THRIVE:

 

In the recently concluded HPS2-THRIVE study, the combination of nicotinic acid / laropiprant (Tredaptive) failed to produce a statistically significant reduction in coronary deaths, non-fatal heart attacks,  strokes or revascularization procedures, being the composite endpoint  which the study was designed to assess. (1).

In the light of these findings, and their assessment by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) and the Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have called for the suspension of TREDAPTIVE and the discontinuation of its use by clinicians as of 12nd January 2013.

The decision to discontinue the clinical use of TREDAPTIVE is unlikely to dissuade  clinicians, who have traditionally used Niacin for purposes of raising HDL levels in selected patients, from continuing to do so.  Their objective would be to raise low HDL levels  in order to achieve the ideal ratio for Total cholesterol:HDL  to be 4 or less.

The OTC formulation of Nicatinamide is suitable for such a strategy.

 It may, on the other hand, provoke concerns amongst those clinicians who have not become familiar with the benefits of Niacin, and who will view the use of Niacin with caution, and thus withhold it’s use from deserving patients.

The pharmacological combination of Niacin  (nicatinamide) and a prostaglandin (laropiprant) had not previously been tested for safety, and the further addition of a     statin to this combination, as in HPS2-THRIVE, was destined to be of questionable efficacy and safety.

This raises critical questions about the design of HPS2-THRIVE.

 It must be noted that the trial was not designed to answer whether or not raising HDL with nicatinamide affects risk, as low HDL was not an inclusion criterion.

Patients with low HDL-C werenot preselected, and all levels of HDL were represented in the treatment arm, making it difficult to evaluate the significance of   HDL increases from a variable baseline level.

The benefit of raising a higher HDL level will not be as significant as raising a lower level of HDL.

The question asked of HPS2-THRIVE was whether nicotinamide, in combination with laropiprant, prevents vascular events in high risk patients who are already receiving intensive lowering treatment with a statin.

In many clinical scenarios TREDAPTIVE would have been given to at risk patients who were not receiving statins, and the conclusions of this study would not be applicable to such groups of patient.

THE STUDY DESIGN:

 

In HPS2-THRIVE 25,673 patents (14,741 in Europe and 10,932 in China) considered to be at high risk for cardiovascular events, were randomized to a placebo arm, in which patients were given a statin (simvastatin 40 mg or 1 tablet of ezetimibe 10 10mg/simvastatin 40mg ) for a background LDL lowering effect.

In the treatment arm patients were given 2 tablets of extended Niacin 1000mg / laropiprant 20mg  (niacin 2000 mg + laropiprant 40mg ) plus simvastatin 40mg,  or ezetimibe 10mg / simvastatin 40mg, in a single dose.

The question must therefore be asked,  whether it was niacin, or laropiprant, or the inclusion of a low dose statin in the treatment group, and in the placebo group, or the off target effects of Ezetimibe, that caused the trial to fail in respect of safety and efficacy.  

 

NIACIN BENEFITS:

 

In a meta-analysis of 11 studies including 9,959 subjects (including Arbiter-2, Arbiter-6 and AIM-HIGH) treatment with niacin on its own was associated with a significant 25% reduction in coronary heart disease events, and a significant 34% reduction in the composite endpoint of any cardiovascular disease. (2).

A  review of recent randomized controlled trials have revealed a significant residual risk for cardiovascular disease events, even at low levels of LDL in the presence of low HDL levels, and this sizable residual risk has been diminished by augmenting HDL-C, for which niacin has a successful track record. (3) (4).

 

In addition to raising low HDL levels, as well as apolipoprotein-A1, in patients who are at risk, niacin has demonstrated reductions in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (Tg), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and lipoprotein a (Lp (a)), and shifts LDL particle size and number from small, dense pattern B (atherogenic) to large, buoyant pattern A (non-atherogenic) LDL.

The other non-lipid mediated atheroprotective benefits of niacin have established it as a viable, safe and effective therapeutic agent for reducing cardiovascular events. (5)

The early perceptions of a trend towards ischaemic stroke with niacin in the AIMHIGH study were unsupported by the evidence, and the absence of such a trend in a meta-analysis by P. Lavinge and R. Karas ( 6)  confirms its  use as an effective agent to reduce coronary heart disease risk.

 

NIACIN PLUS STATIN:

 

Combinations of niacin and a statin, likewise, have demonstrated improvements in a variety of surrogate endpoints, as in Arbiter 3 – (7) and Arbiter 6 – HALTS (8) .

The efficacy and safety of combination tablets of niacin extended release with simvastatin, compared to simvastatin alone, were demonstrated in the SEACOAST Study. (9)

Since the clinical efficacy and safety of Nicene has not been called into question in these and several other studies, the combination of niacin and a prostaglandin, raises questions about the potential off-target effects of laropiprant.  

Notably, the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System has found prescription Nicene to be safer than simvastatin, pravastatin, atorvastatin, gemfibrozil and fenofibrate. (10), thereby  confirming a significant clinical role for nicene in the treatment of mixed dyslipidaemias.

 

LAROPIPRANT EFFECTS ?

 

The safety of laropiprant in combination with a statin has never been demonstrated, raising questions about the potential adverse effects of laropiprant on atheroprotective pathways.

Laropripant blocks DP1 receptors on vascular cells and thereby prevents flushing, but it may also have unwanted effects on other DP1 receptors located on platelets and epithelial cells in the lungs and respiratory tissues.

 

STATIN EFFECTS ?

 

Statins too, have been shown, in some cases, to promote coronary artery calcification, a risk marker for cardiovascular disease.

Despite their observed benefits in some secondary prevention studies, ( unrelated to their LDL lowering potential,) their pleitropic effects may include other effects which are potentially detrimental, and which may explain the increased prevalence and extent of coronary artery calcification, by as much as 52%, in statin users compared to non-stain users. (11).

The widespread incidence of nerve and muscle damage in statin users has been extensively documented, and the mechanisms whereby such damage occurs has been proposed by Seneff et al. (12)

The significantly higher prevalence of coronary artery calcification in patients with type 2 diabetes is seen more frequently in statin users than in non-statin users (13), and the higher risk for new onset diabetes in statin users has been the subject of recent FDA warnings. (14)

The failure of Ezetimibe /Simvastatin, in the Enhance Study, (15) to reduce the atheroma burden in 720 patients with Familial Hypercholesterolaemia,  despite a 58% reduction of LDL from baseline with the combination, and a 41% reduction in LDL with Simvastatin alone,  raises questions about the potential for the combined therapy, or Ezetimibe alone, to advance, rather than impede, atherosclerosis in some patients.

 

EZETIMIBE EFFECTS ?

 

We don’t know what proportion of subjects in either group were given Ezetimibe in place of the combined statin therapy, and to what degree any potential off target effects of Ezetimibe might have influenced the outcome.

 

Ezetimibe has been shown by some researchers to trigger pro-atherogenic gene regulation mechanisms, including the inhibition of scavenger receptor B1 (SRB1) and ATP – binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1), giving rise to unintended consequences. (16)

Other studies, however, show no such effect on these genes. (17).

 

HDL BENEFITS:

 

While it is well established that HDL-C level is an inverse predictor of cardiovascular risk, it remains to be shown whether HDL per se,  or specific sub-groups of HDL, or other factors associated with HDL elevations, are responsible for the observed reductions in cardiovascular events.

 

Increases in HDL LEVELS  of 5%-26% were independently associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in several trials. (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) suggesting thereby a preventative role for strategies that augment HDL-C  levels.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

 

The failure of TREDAPTIVE to show a statistically significant beneficial effect  in HPS2-THRIVE may be due to several factors linked to the design of this study, with a soup of ingredients in the treatment arm, any one of which, in combination with the other, could have obscured any potential benefit in that arm.

 

The preliminary results of this trial are insufficient to dissuade clinicians from targeting low HDL as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, or from using Niacin (nicotinamide) to augment HDL-C levels in at risk patients.

 

Dr. Neville Wilson, The Leinster Clinic, Maynooth, Ireland. (30 January, 2013).

 

REFERENCES:

 

  1. www.thrivestudy.org
  2. JACC Dec 19, 2012.
  3. Current Athero Rep 2000 (2) 36-46.
  4. Am J Cardiol 2007 (100) S53-S61.
  5. Am J Cardiol 2008 (101) 20B-26B.
  6. JACC March 27, 2012, vol 59, issue 13.
  7. Current Med Res Opin 2006 (22) 2243-2750.
  8. JACC 2010 (55) 2721-2726.
  9. J Chem Lipidol 2008 (2), 79-90 Pub Med.

10. Am J Cardiol 2008 (101) 9B-13 B (US FDA Adverse Event Reporting Database).

11. Atherosclerosis Aug 24, 2012 – VADT.

12. Seneff S. How Statins Really Work. (seneff@csail.mit.edu)

13. Diabetes Care 2012, 8 Aug.

14. FDA. Gov. FDA Expands Advice on Statins Risk.

15. NEJM April 3, 2008. Enhance Study.

16.J Nutr 2005; 135: 2305-2312.

17.J Atheroscler Threomb2007; 14: 99-108.

18. Circulation 1984:69 (2) 325-337. Coronary Intervention Study.

19.JAMA 1984:251 (3) 365-374.  Lipid Research Clinics Program.

20.JAMA 1988:260 95) 641-652. Helsinki Heart Study.

21.NEJM 2001:345 (22) 1583-1592.

22.Circulation 1998;97 (15) 1453-1460. 4S Study.

23.JAMA 2001; 285 (12) 1585-1591.

 

ooooOOOoooo

 

 

HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN – HIGHER IS BETTER

by   DR. NEVILLE WILSON.
PREAMBLE:
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of death in the Western World.  Yet, despite the documented decrease in cardiac-related mortality since the late 1960s, the incidence of CHD has not declined in recent years. (1)
Data from EUROASPIRE III shows that primary strategies for cardiovascular risk reduction have not been successful, raising questions about current intervention policies and practices. (2)
It is therefore timely and appropriate to review the classical guidelines  that dictate practice policy, taking account of new data recently extracted from previous studies.
Newly emergent data reveals a consistent pattern of associations between low levels of HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN-CHOLESTEROL (HDL-C) and  an increased risk of CHD.
This paper reviews emergent data that demonstrates the cardiovascular benefits of a high level of HDL-C, and examines the nature and properties of HDL-C, followed by references to possible strategies for improving HDL-C levels for purposes of reducing the risk of CHD.
NCEP RECOMMENDATIONS:
In 2004 the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) recommended reductions of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to targets of 2.6 mMol/L (<100mg/dl) as a strategy for reducing the risk cardiovascular disease, and even to lower targets of 1.81mMol/L (<70mg/dl) in high risk patients. However, this strategy has failed to produce the expected levels of benefit, as shown by current reviews of the evidence, thereby prompting an ongoing search for an optimal atherogenic lipid risk profile that is predictable and measurable.(3)
Epidemiological studies have uncovered an association between low high density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and an increased risk of CHD, thereby identifying a potentially important area for cardio – protection intervention.  These findings give credence to the hypothesis that HDL-C levels provide greater predictive value for cardiovascular risk than do LDL-C levels.
This hypothesis is currently the focal point of much research in endeavours to profitably identify the significant factors that contribute to morbidity and mortality risk.

FRAMINGHAM STUDY:

Data from the Framingham Study as far back as 1977 showed that HDL-C was a more potent predictive factor for risk than LDL-C. (4)   In 12 years of follow-up for 2748 participants, aged 30 – 79 years, low levels of HDL-C were associated with increased mortality. ( 5) Despite this revelation, LDL-C reduction with statin therapy remains the focus for risk management initiatives in current guidelines.
The NCEP guidelines also state that “setting a specific goal value for raising HDL-C  was not warranted”. However, it is evident that while statin drugs can effect marked LDL-C reductions, their capacity to raise HDL-C is limited to 3% -15%  or is absent. (6)

TNT STUDY. (TO NEW TARGETS).

New data from the TNT Study reveals that subjects who had their LDL-C levels substantially reduced with high dose (80mg) Lipitor, nevertheless remained at risk if their HDL-C levels remained low.  Prof. Philip Barter and colleagues showed that a low level of HDL-C remains predictive for major cardiovascular events, even in statin treated patients who have achieved low LDL-C levels of below 70mg/dl (1.8Mm/L). (7).

The TNT STUDY sought to test the risk benefits of lowering LDL-C to new targets and selectively investigated 1001 patients with stable CHD, who were randomized to either 80 mg Lipitor or 10 mg Lipitor per day, and followed for 4.9 years. (Of the original 18,469 participants screened for inclusion in the study 8468 were excluded for a variety of reasons, some not stated.)
The TNT STUDY researchers reported a “significant risk reduction of 22%, prompting declarations from some quarters that “lower is better”, with reference to LDL-C targets. The apparently “significant” benefits  of 22% looked less impressive when the absolute risk reduction revealed an insignificant benefit, prompting several observers to call for caution with respect to LDL-C lowering.
Newly obtained data from TNT now clearly shows that those subjects who had low LDL-C levels, irrespective of the degree to which their LDL-C had been lowered while taking high dose Lipitor, nevertheless remained at risk for a major cardiovascular event. (7)
In TNT 2661 of the subjects achieved the desired low levels of LDL-C (1.8mMol/L: <70 mg/dl) and yet remained at significant risk. Those with HDL-C levels >55mg/dl (>1.42 mMol/L ) had a 39% lower risk of a major cardiovascular event than those with HDL-C levels of <37 mg/dl (0.96 mMol/L).
The concept that “ lower is better” has thus been overshadowed by an emergent awareness that “higher is better “, thus demonstrating the limitations of current guidelines, and the need to incorporate HDL-C as an important therapeutic target.
THE PROCAM STUDY:
Procam Study researchers analysed data from more than 20,000 subjects in Germany over a period of 25 years and developed a scoring system for predicting global CHD risk.  Unlike the homogenous American population targeted by the Framingham investigators, a Northern European population was selectively studied between 1979 and 1995.  This study showed that HDL-C is an important driver of CHD risk, and provided evidence that HDL-C levels exert a much stronger influence on CHD risk in individuals with elevated global risk.  An important outcome of Procam was that CHD risk factors do not act in isolation, but in conjunction with each other.  (8).
MAJOR STUDIES REVIEWED:
 
A review of the data from three major studies (a) Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence (LRC) Mortality Follow Up, (b)  Coronary Primary Prevention Trial (CPPT), and (c) Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) revealed that every decrease in HDL-C level by 1 mg/dl (0.03mMol/L) was associated with an increase in the risk of CHD of 2% for males and 3% for females, confirming the evidence that emerged from earlier studies.  (9)
Data from the HONOLULU HEART PROGRAMME  indicated that higher levels of HDL-C ( up to 1.5 mMol/L (or 60mg/dl) should be attained to achieve risk containment benefit, and a review of the INTERHEART ASIAN STUDY data base revealed that subjects with normal or higher HDL-C had a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at all levels of LDL-C. (10) and that the ratio of ApoB/ ApoA1 was the strongest predictor of AMI risk in Asians.

INTERVENTIVE STUDIES:
The strong association between HDL-C and risk reduction, as evident in epidemiological studies, has also been tested in several interventive and experimental studies. (11)
Peter Libbey et al show that in all the major statin interventive trials the treated subjects have remained at risk despite their lowered LDL-C levels. (12) And in a meta-analysis of 90,000 subjects in 14 prospective randomised statin trials, low HDL-C at baseline represented a significant contributor to cardiovascular risk. (13)
The VETERANS AFFAIRS HDL INTERVENTIVE TRIAL successfully tested the hypothesis that raising HDL-C with a fibrate could produce benefits for high risk males, (14) thereby reproducing similar findings that emerged from the earlier HELSINKI HEART STUDY.
ApoA-Imilano (apoA-IM)
 
Carriers of the apoA-IM, a genetic variant of apoA-I, have extremely low levels of HDL-C, but have little evidence of cardiovascular disease. Intravenous infusions of recombinant apoA-IM induced a marked reversal of atherosclerosis in 57 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and >20% coronary artery obstruction,  a study that has prompted cautious suggestions in some quarters of a future role for HDL-C infusions in high risk subjects. (16)

THE NATURE OF HDL-C:

HDL-C is one of several groups of lipoproteins which facilitates the transport of lipids, including cholesterol and triglycerides, through the circulating blood stream.  HDL is the smallest of these (7-12 nm diam.) and thus the most dense, containing the highest amount of protein.
 Their composite and complex structure renders them capable of numerous biological functions. In addition to lipid transport mechanisms, they exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, thereby conferring a range of cardiovascular and cardioprotective benefits if sufficiently present.
 HDL-C particles are constantly altering their shape and function, during which process they transport several types of phosopholipids and proteins in the plasma. While the core of the HDL-C particle is cholesterol ester and triglyceride (TG), its surface is comprised of phospholipids, free cholesterol and apolipoproteins, of which apo A-I appears to be the major surface protein.
 HDL particles may be classified according to their (i) apolipoprotein, (ii) size, (iii) surface charge, (iv) density, thus a variety of designations may be used to describe the range of HDL-C particles so far identified.  The two major sub fractions are HDL2 (large) and HDL3 (small), and these can be further allocated to sub populations, a, b, or c.  HDL2b are the largest fractions (35% protein/65% lipids) while the HDL3c are the smallest fractions (65% protein 35% lipids). Small, dense HDL3 possesses multiple anti-atherogenic properties, including potent cholesterol efflux capacity and anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and anti-poptotic activities. (17)
The widespread and simplistic notion of LDL-C “clogging” arterial walls and HDL-C “scouring” these walls to “unblock cholesterol plugs”, ignores the complex sequence of inflammatory events that occur in the layers of the arterial wall during the process of atheroma formation.  The concept of “bad cholesterol” plugging arteries while “good cholesterol” does the “unplugging” is unscientific and erroneous.
HDL-C exerts its beneficial influence by interfering with the process of vascular wall inflammation, and is operative  at several levels in the cascade of events that leads to atheroma and plaque formation.
ARTERIAL WALL INFLAMMATION appears to be a “response to injury”, (18) following endothelial (arterial wall inner lining) damage from any of several factors which appear to play a pro-oxidant role in the process. There is no evidence  that total cholesterol or LDL cholesterol (“bad cholesterol”) “causes” atherosclerosis . Alterations to native LDL-C may occur under pro-oxidant conditions giving rise to oxidized LDL which may initiate or  aggravate an inflammatory process within the arterial wall, causing atheroma formation. HDL-C has been shown to interrupt this process in a beneficial way through the import of  its anti-atherogenic  properties.
 
THE ANTI-ATHEROGENIC PROPERTIES OF HDL-C:
 
1.  INHIBITION OF MONOCYTE ADHESION:
Native LDL-C may be modified under certain adverse conditions, thereby stimulating the endothelial cells lining the arterial lumen to express a protein, monocyte chemotactic protein 1(MCP-1), which in turn attracts monocytes from the blood into the arterial wall.  The oxidized LDL also causes the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages which engulf the modified LDL giving rise to the formation of foam cells. Macrophages also express cytokines which include  tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) and Interleuken-1, which cause the endothelial cells to express adhesion molecules E.selectin, Vcam-1, and Icam-1.  These adhesion molecules bind the monocytes to the endothelium, and some of them are attracted into the artery wall by MCP-1.
HDL intercepts this inflammatory process by inhibiting the expression of E selectin and
Vcam-1, thereby decreasing the binding of inflammatory cells within the arterial wall
inhibiting the process of atherosclerosis. (19)
2.     INHIBITION OF LDL-C OXIDATION.
 
HDL contains an enzyme, Paroxinase 1 (PON 1), which inhibits the formation of MCP-1, thereby preventing its attraction into the arterial wall. (20).  It also protects LDL from oxidation, limiting thereby the inflammatory response to modified LDL.  By preventing the oxidation of LDL, via PON 1, HDL inhibits the vasoconstricting effects of  oxidized LDL, effected through Nitric Oxide depletion.  It thus permits vasodilation and improves endothelial function.
HDL also carries alpha- tocopherol (vit.E) to the endothelial cells thereby providing another mechanism for suppressing the oxidation of LDL. Vitamin E inhibits the ability of oxidized LDL-C to induce 1CAM-1 expression, (21) and has also been shown to suppress the gene that codes for 1CAM-1. (22)
High levels of vitamin C have also been shown to be associated with high plasma HDL and HDL2, suggesting that high plasma levels of vitamin C may lower atherogenic risk by increasing HDL-C. (23)
The Flavenoid Quercetin, has also been shown to enhance the protective mechanisms of HDL-C by upregulating PON1 gene expression and its protective capacity against LDL-C oxidation. (24)
3.     ANTI-THROMBOTIC PROPERTIES OF HDL-C
Intra-arterial thrombi may occlude vessels and lead to cardiovascular or cerebro-vascular
events, and are dependent on the degree of plasma coagulation, which in turn is determined,
either, by reduced fibrinolysis or increased platelet aggregation.
Since levels of tissue plasminogen activator (PAI-1) determine the fibrinolytic capacity of the
blood, conditions which predispose to elevated PAI-1 would represent risks to health.
Low levels of HDL-C have been shown to correlate with elevated levels of PAI-1, (25)  and in a study of males without a history of cardiovascular disease, Halle et al correlated hyperfibrinoginaemia with elevated levels of LDL and reduced levels of HDL2. (26)
 Therefore, HDLs exert anti-atherogenic and anti-thrombotic effects that are consistent with a marked reduction in the risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality.
These findings support the use of preventative or therapeutic strategies to improve HDL levels in subjects who are at risk by virtue of having low HDL levels.
4.  REVERSE TRANSPORT:
HDL is capable of transporting cholesterol from peripheral cells to the liver for recycling and excretion into the bile.  Under the action of the enzyme lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) free cholesterol is converted into cholesterol ester, which is more hydrophobic, and then sequestered into the core of the lipo- protein particle, which becomes larger as more cholesterol is incorporated.
The cholesterol is then delivered to the liver, or to the steroidogenic organs, such as the adrenals, ovary, or testes, where it is beneficially utilized in the production of steroid hormones.  One of several pathways is an indirect one, mediated by cholesterol ester tranferase protein (CETP) in which cholesterol is transported from lipid laden macrophages.
 CETP also facilitates the transfer of cholesterol from HDL particles to the VLDL/LDL in exchange for triglyceride, thereby reducing circulating HDL levels. This process may be pro-atherogenic since cholesterol is delivered from the protective HDL to the pro-atherogenic VLDL/LDL and is itself reduced quantitatively in the process.
It becomes evident then, that both LDL-C and HDL-C can be modified under certain physiological conditions to become pro-atherogenic.
The pharmacological inhibition of CETP continues to be explored as an option for raising HDL levels, despite the earlier unfortunate consequences of CEPT inhibition by the drug Torcetrapib. (Illuminate Study).

THE PREVALENCE OF LOW HDL-C:

 Data from the NHANES data base over a 30-year period (1976-1980); (1988-1994); (1999-2006) reveals a prevalence of low HDL-C and a concomitant doubling of triglyceride (TG) between 1999-2006 (from 2.1% – 4.8%) and a trebling from 1.8% – 8.7% between 1976 and 2006.  (27)
Accompanying these changes in HDL-C and TG is a trend of escalating obesity, which has more than doubled (15% – 33.7%) between 1976 and 2006. Escalating rates of obesity are prevalent at a time when low fat / high carbohydrate diets are encouraged and endorsed by the food and health industries. The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends low-fat diets, thereby encouraging consumers to replace these dietary options with processed foods that are low in saturated fat, high in simple carbohydrates and high in trans-fatty acids.

THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF HIGH HDL-C

 
Scant recognition is given to the fact that dietary saturated fats, in fact, raise HDL levels and improve lipid ratios, (28) and have been shown to reduce the progression of coronary artery disease in post-menopausal women. (29) ( These facts have been known for a long time, and were reported in an analytical review of 27 studies in 1992, (30) and only referred to in 2000 by the American Heart Association in its revised dietary guidelines. )
 The dietary intake of the anti-oxidants vitamin E and vitamin C also raise HDL-C levels, as does resveretrol, a poly-phenol component of red grape skins and seeds, thereby imparting cardio-protective benefits.
Since aerobic exercise also raises HDL-C, a sedentary lifestyle, coupled with the consumption of simple carbohydrates at the expense of complex carbohydrates and healthy fats, inevitably contributes to elevated triglycerides and low HDL levels, and thereby increases the risk of morbidity and mortality.

STRATEGIES FOR INCREASING HDL-C LEVELS:

Interventive strategies for raising healthy HDL-C levels will include lifestyle changes that incorporate the following:
(i)             Body weight reductions through calorie restriction. For every 1 kg. of  body weight reduction there is up to 1% increase in plasma HDL-C, if weight loss is sustained.
(ii)           Aerobic exercise has been shown to raise HDL-C by about 3%. Moderate exercise several times a week has also been shown to be effective for this purpose.
(iii)          Smoking can reduce HDL-C, while smoking cessation can increase HDL-C by as much as 10%.
(iv)          Moderate alcohol consumption can increase HDL-C, but may also increase the levels of potentially atherogenic lipo-proteins and triglycerides, which may counteract any potential benefits associated with HDL-C increases. Resveretrol, a polyphenol present in the skins and seeds of red grapes, improves HDL-C levels favourably.
(v)           Dietary saturated fats can raise HDL-C levels. Contrary to the recommendations of the American Heart Association (AHA), many lipid researchers advocate the inclusion of healthy saturated fats, such as lauric acid and myristic acid,  in the daily diet and the exclusion of harmful trans-fats which are ubiquitious in processed foods. (31)
(vi)          Omega 3 polyunsaturated fats favourably influence plasma lipids providing an improvement in immune status in a dietary intake ratio of 3;1 (omega 6/ omega 3), and may be obtained from cold water oily fish (salmon) or quality fish oil supplements. An excess of omega 6, as found in a typical western diet, of 20:1, may shift the physiological state to pro-inflammatory. (32)
(vii)        The dietary or supplemental role of the anti-oxidants vitamin E, vitamin C and Quercetin have a supportive role in maintaining healthy levels of HDL-C.
While pharmaceutical agents for raising HDL levels are available, sole reliance on these mechanisms for cardiovascular risk reduction  are likely to impede progress in the education process aimed at effecting beneficial lifestyle modifications.
Fibrates have been shown to increase HDL-C by 10%, and Nicotinic Acid can achieve HDL-C increases of up to 30% and reduce triglycerides (Tg) by 40% to 50%, and reduce LDL-C by up to 20%.
CETP blockade can increase HDL-C by as much as 50%, but the potential role of CETP inhibitors has been called into question following termination of the ILLUMINATE study.
Anacetrapib is a CETP inhibitor currently under clinical investigation, and appears not to be associated with blood pressure increases, as was Torcetrapib. At 10mg. It has shown increases of HDL-C up to 41%.
JTT-705 is another CETP inhibitor that raises HDL-C without evidence, so far, of blood pressure increases.
Combination therapy of ER Niacin and simvastatin are being evaluated in the AIM-HIGH STUDY.
Ongoing intervention studies will further define the benefits of combination therapies that reduce LDL-C and elevate HDL-C.
.
 Strategies for raising public awareness of risks to health remain the responsibility of primary care physicians who are best placed to advocate drug free options before resorting to prescription medicines.
The INTERHEART STUDY results indicate that a multiplicity of factors are likely to be implicated in cardio-vascular disease, and that psycho-social factors, may contribute to a substantial proportion of the risk for acute myocardial infarction. (AMI)
While the global effect was less than for smoking, it was comparable with hypertension and obesity. The effects of stress on AMI were similar in men and women, in people of all ages, and in all geographic regions of the world studied.

CONCLUSION

The INTERHEART STUDY reminds us that the risks to health are multi-factorial and that multi-level interventions may be required to reduce the levels of risk for many people. These should include strategies which prioritise lifestyle changes.  A preoccupation with lipids while ignoring other vital factors that impact on cardiovascular health will do little to stem the tide of an escalating and seemingly unstoppable trend.
Healthy lipid ratios, rather than lipid levels, remain part of the global  target for cardio-vascular disease risk reduction. Since current preoccupations with LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) lowering have not succeeded in attaining such desirable objectives, the shift to a newparadigm that embraces HDL-C enhancement is incumbent.
DR. NEVILLE WILSON.
APRIL, 2009.
REFERENCES:
 
2.     Eur J. Cardiovascular Prev. Rehab 2009.
3.     Am J. Cardiol. 2006,Feb., 1:97(3):372-5
4.     A. Med. J 1977;62:707-14 Framingham Study.
5.     Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis & Vascular Biol. 1988:8;737-741
6.     Am Coll of Cardiol Annual Sc. Session, Orlando, March,29-31, 2009-05-03
7.     NEJM. Vol. 357, Sept 27, 2007;1301-1310
8.     Atherosclerosis 1996;124 Supplement:S11-S20
9.     Circulation:1989; 79: 8-15
10.  Lancet 2004; 364:937-52
11.  J Am Cardiol 2008; 51:49-55
12.  J Am Coll Cardiol: 2005; 46:1225-8
13.  Lancet 2005; 366:1267-78
14.  JAMA 2110; 285; 1585-1591
15.  Nejm 1987: 317:1237-1245
16.  JAMA 2003: 290; 2292-2300
17.  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006: 3(3): 144-153
18.  Am J Pathol 1977 March, 86(3): 675-684
19.  European Heart J Supplements, vol 7, supp F-Philip Barter.
20.  Biochem Biophys Ref Comm 2004; 318:680-683
21.  Bejing Da Xua Bao, 2004, Feb 36(1):70-74
22.  Ann NY Acad. Sci 2004 Dec; 1031:86-95
23.  Am J Clinical Nutrition 1994 July: 60(1):100-5
24.  Biochem & Biophysical Research Communications vol 379, issue 4, 20 Feb.2009 (p.1001-4)
25.  Thrombo Res 1993:70:161-171
26.  Arteriosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 1996: 16; 144-148
27.  NHANES: Circ 2008; 118:S_1081-S_1082
28.  J. Nutrition 133; 78-83, Jan 2003
29.  Am J Clin Nutrition 2004,; 80:1175-84
30.  Arteriosc Thromb 1992 Aug; 12 (8): 911-9
31.  Know Your Fats:  Mary G. Enig, Ph.D
32.  Fats Are Good For You : Jon J. Kabara, Ph.D

IRISH DOCTORS FOR CANADA ?

By Dr. Neville Wilson

The process of recruiting Irish doctors to distant locations is currently in full swing .

Kindersley Clinic, in Saskatchewan, Canada, invites GPs to apply for 6 advertised positions as Family Physicians (Oct 22, 2012)

(In Canada you will be called a Family Physician, or Physician & Surgeon, but not a “GP” ! )

Irish doctors may be tempted to consider the many professional and lifestyle benefits available through relocation to rural Canada or Australia, and while departure from the Irish Health Services represents a regrettable loss of valuable manpower, with widespread repercussions for health services at home, the personal and professional gains of working within a sophisticated and efficient Health Care system cannot be discounted, added to which are easily manageable working conditions, adequate recreational opportunities, and better remuneration rewards.

I have lived and worked in both of these countries and can vouch for the distinct personal and professional  advantages  of such an enterprise.

While the attractive features of professional and recreational life in each of these two countries will be proudly highlighted by recruiting agents, a degree of cultural shock must be anticipated as aspiring recruits plant themselves in unfamiliar territory.

Rural Canada is geographically vast and ethically diverse, and the standard of living at the higher end of the scale, with fewer banking restrictions than currently experienced in Ireland.

The multicultural flavor of Canadian life will invariably manifest itself in your social, recreational and professional activities, and you may also find yourself working alongside colleagues from other countries.

As you lose your connections with cherished national sporting activities back home, you will soon transfer your attention to gridiron football and ice hockey, and may even acquire a few “pucking” skills on the local curling rink.  (Every small  town in Canada has an ice rink. )

Winters in Saskatchewan can be brutal, with temperatures as low as -20C,  while prairie blizzards can push the thermometer down to -40 C.  Specialised winter woolies and boots  are an absolute necessity during these bitter months,  but they do give way to predictable summers (unlike Ireland) during which T shirts and shorts would be appropriate for the comfortable temperatures of 20 C TO 35 C.

Sight seeing will not be at the top of your activity list, as the sparse, flat prairies could prompt melancholic recollections of the contrasting Irish terrain, tucked away in memory lane.

You will, however, be impressed by the vast expanses of stunning yellow canola  in flower,  against a backdrop of deep blue cloudless summer skies, interrupted only by box-shaped grain elevators dotted across the endless prairies.

Canada is the world’s largest producer of Canola, used widely as a cooking oil and salad dressing.  She is also the world’s 7th largest producer of wheat, with sales looking promising in the wake of a severe draught in the US. Midwest.

The snow swept prairies, during the icy winter months, are a classical winter wonderland post-card picture, and you will certainly try your hand (and legs) at cross-country skiing.

Medical practice is very different to what you will have experienced in Ireland, and not only will hands -on medicine be an exhilarating inevitability, it will often be mandatory, and don’t be surprised if you acquire new skills during your sojourn.

Since most rural practices are attached to a small District Hospital, the family physicians take responsibility for primary and secondary patient care, and you will be attending  to out-patient, as well as in-patient challenges, as well as to emergency admissions on your nights or week-ends on call.

Kindersley has a well equipped operating room (OR), emergency room (ER), and laboratory facilities,  and any surgical and resuscitation skills you may have acquired will be put to good use.  Don’t be surprised to find your GP colleagues performing tonsillectomies, C-Sections, circumcisions, and a wide range of surgical procedures. There are no “consultants” in the rural areas!  You are it !

I was invited to provide obstetric services to the Kindersley Practice in the early nineties, and welcomed the opportunity for such a diversity of patient care and practice.

It would be a recommendation to have gained proficiency in the ATLS and ACLS prior to undertaking any rural  appointment , either in Canada or Australia.

Your earnings in Canada are likely to be higher than experienced in Ireland, and procedural work can attract additional income.  Most  of the doctors who have worked in Canada have managed to increase their savings potential and can afford the “extras” previously denied.

Unlike Ireland, the Canadian economy is currently in expansion,  rather than recession, and you will have no difficulty negotiating a loan for home or car purchase, should you decide to make your move a permanent one.

The MEDICARE  health care system is operative throughout the Provinces of Canada, allowing it’s populace to access a wide range of services free at the point of delivery.

Registration for a Provincial License to practice medicine is processed through application to the College of Physicians & Surgeons, Saskatchewan, who will expect you to prepare for,  and  sit, the Medical Council of Canada Evaluating Exam (MCCEE), without which you may not practice in Canada for longer than 5 years.

Rural Canada ( Saskatchewan , Manitoba and Alberta) offers many challenging and rewarding opportunities for doctors who wish to apply themselves to broad spectrum medical care.

Applications from Irish, Australian , South African, New Zealand and UK medical graduates are likely to be successful, as medical protocols in these countries share a common pattern.

You will, however, experience departures from some standard nomenclature, such as epinephrine instead of adrenaline, and Tylenol, (acetaminophen) as the popular antipyretic and analgesic, instead of Paracetamol.

If you ask the ER nurse for a torch you will flummox her, until she discovers that you mean a flashlight !  And if you happen to mention that your skis are in the boot of your car, you will get an even stranger look, until she discovers that you actually mean the trunk of your car !

 

South Africa provided the major reservoir for doctor recruitment during the 80s and 90s, until the South African Government took the Canadians to task for “ poaching their doctors”.  The massive exodus of South African doctors was subsequently restricted by political pressure on the Canadian government.

At that time more than 50% of rural practices and Hospitals were staffed by South Africans,  and currently 20% – 25 % of practicing physicians in Saskatchewan are South African trained.

Many of them have made Canada their permanent home.

Hopefully, Ireland will not be forced to lodge a  complaint on similar grounds  against the Canadian government in the years to come !

The Canadians are a warm and friendly people who value the medical services provided for them by foreign nationals.

They will welcome you heartily and embrace you as one of their own, and my experience is that they will do everything to prolong your stay in Canada.

 

Dr. Neville Wilson,

The Leinster Clinic,

Maynooth,

IRELAND.

30.10.12

 

LOSS OF FUNDING FOR FISH OIL

by Dr. Neville Wilson

Health conscious consumers of Omega-3 have been stunned by the recent implementation of a “cost saving strategy” which includes the removal of omega-3 from the list of reimbursable health products.

Patients who have been receiving prescribed omega-3 (EPA / DHA ), for a variety of legitimate medical indications, and health protective reasons, have been informed by their pharmacists that they are now responsible for meeting the costs of these prescribed nutrients.

The Irish Medicines Board (IMB), in support of a state strategy to save €26.5 million, has endorsed the HSE decision to deprive large sections of the Irish population of this widely tested and well proven health supportive agent.

The unprecedented move to discontinue state funding for prescription omega 3 (Omacor, or Morepa) was prompted by a dubious finding from a recently conducted Greek study, concluding that “there is insufficient evidence” for the use of omega 3 as a preventative strategy in patients with established heart disease.

The study was a meta-analysis, which is a systematic review of pre-selected clinical trials, and a statistical analysis of their collective outcomes, and reported in a recent edition of JAMA. (1)

The Greek researchers looked at 20 selected studies, involving 68,680 randomised patients, and tabulated the associations of omega-3 with reported deaths from heart attacks, death from all causes, stroke and sudden death.

Their conclusion was a “lack of association” between omega-3 and prevention of these cardiovascular outcomes.

This conclusion flies in the face of several hundred well conducted studies, over several decades, documenting the protective and survival benefits for healthy persons, as well as for those at risk of a recurrent heart attack.

A marked decrease in the risk for heart attack among fish oil consumers was noted by Bang and Dyberg more than 30 years ago, (2) (3) and confirmed by several subsequent investigators in Japan, Holland, Norway and the USA, and more than 25 trials have confirmed the positive association between increased tissue levels of EPA/DHA and reductions in major cardiovascular events. (4)

More recently, an extensive review of the positive health benefits of omega-3 prompted an eminent American cardiologist, Dr. Carl Lavie, to say, “ physicians are not as familiar with omega-3 as they are with statins…..as they should be”, and as a therapeutic agent, omega-3 “should be promoted to clinicians” (5 )

The most compelling evidence for the cardiovascular benefits of omega-3 PUFA comes from 4 large controlled trials of nearly 40,000 participants randomized to receive eicosapentanoic acid (EPA), with or without docosahexanoic acid (DHA), in studies of patients in primary prevention, after myocardial infarction, and with heart failure.

The first randomized controlled trial (RCT) which demonstrated the benefits of omega-3 was conducted in1989 at the University of Wales, known as the Diet & Reinfarction Trial (DART). In this study 2033 men with a history of a prior heart attack, receiving a diet of fish, or supplemented fish oil, experienced a 29% reduction in death after 2 years of dietary intervention. (6)

The landmark Gissi-Prevenzione trial conducted in 1999, and involving 11,323 patients who had previously suffered a heart attack, reported a dramatic 30% reduction in death from heart attack, and 45% reduction in sudden death at the conclusion of the 4 year study. (7)

A Harvard University study in 2002 reported a 80% reduction in risk for sudden cardiac death for those who had high levels of serum EPA and DHA, compared to those with low levels. (8)

In a large Japanese Trial (JELIS) 18, 645 subjects were randomized to 2 groups, one with a statin, and the other a statin plus purified EPA 1800 gms. (9)

After 5 years of observation the group using EPA and low dose stain had a 19% greater reduction in cardiovascular events than the group using only statins. There were no cases of sudden death reported.

The mechanisms whereby EPA & DHA exert their protective health benefits are well documented, (and confirmed in JELIS) demonstrating that they have anti-platelet, anti-inflammatory and triglyceride lowering effects (10), produce vaso-dilation and reduce blood pressure (11), improve arterial endothelial function (12), have anti-arrhythmic effects and can improve heart failure and reduce sudden cardiac death (13), suppress the production of pro- inflammatory cytokines (14) and offer benefit to obese patients by increasing adiponectin levels, reducing inflammation and improving insulin sensitivity. (15)

At the cellular level EPA & DHA confer cardiovascular benefits through enrichment and protection of cellular membrane phospholipids. (16)

The relevance of the recently reported Greek meta-analysis as a therapeutic guide for clinicians, has been called into question by the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) and other influential bodies, on the grounds that small, short term studies were selected, while the longer and larger studies that showed a positive role for omega-3 were excluded.

The meta-analysis included trials in which patients were likely to be using cocktails of platelet, cholesterol and blood pressure lowering drugs, making it impossible to attribute outcomes solely to their omega 3 intake.

The “cherry-picking” of under- powered studies, while ignoring well powered studies, therefore served to produce a predictable outcome, and questions may be raised as to what the underlying motive was in conducting such a limited analysis.

Meta-analyses are considered to be a poor substitute for a prospective randomized trial, and lack of evidence from such a review does not prove lack of benefit.

Since these findings are in conflict with the epidemiological and observational evidence, and the outcomes of large randomized controlled trials which show the benefits of EPA and DHA in primary and secondary care, their relevance for clinical guidelines or therapeutic recommendation must be discounted.

To withhold supplemental fish oil from deserving patients on the basis of such a flawed meta-analysis is unjustifiable and clinically irresponsible, and represents a retrogressive move at a time when the quality of healthcare needs to be maximized.

In the best health interests of our young and elderly patients, and all those at risk, the hasty decision to withhold marine-3 fish oils from deserving patients should be reversed with immediate effect.

Dr. Neville Wilson.
Medical Director,
The Leinster Clinic,
Maynooth.
22 September, 2012.

REFERENCES:

1. JAMA 2012; 308 (10): 1024-1033
2. Bang et al, Acta Med Scandinavia 192, 1972, 85-94
3. Dyberg et al, Am J Clin Nutr 28, 1975, 958-966
4. Harris et al, Atherosclerosis 193, 2007, 170.
5. J Am Coll Cardiol, Aug 11, 2009; 54: 585-594
6. Lancet 1989 Sept 30, 2 (8666): 757-61 (DART)
7. Lancet 1999 Aug 7: 354(9177): 447-55 (GISSI)
8. New Eng J Med 2002 April 11, 346; (5) 113-8
9. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 613-620
10. Lancet 3161, 2003; 477-484
11. Am J Cardiol 97, 2006, 1127-1130
12. Circ 88, 1993, 11251-11285
13. JAMA 296, 2006, 1885-1899
14. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 2007, 385-391
15. Art Thromb Vasc Biol 27, 2007: 1918-1925

FAT TAX IS MISGUIDED

A Letter printed in IRISH TIMES (19 OCT, 2012).

Sir, – Jennifer 0′Connell raises some legitimate concerns about the proposed levy on saturated fats, as part of government policy to impose a tax on dietary fats, sugar and salt. (Life page -October 17th).

Unfortunately, she falls into the same trap as did the researchers at the economics workshop in Galway, who hope to raise €188 million in revenue by such tax impositions.

The proposal to follow the example of Denmark, by imposing a tax on saturated fats reflects a poor understanding of the distinctive differences between natural, healthy, saturated fats, ( butter, cheese, etc) and unhealthy partially – hydrogenated fats, high in trans-fat and vegetable oils, which are amongst the chief culprits in our current epidemic of obesity and heart disease.

High fructose corn syrup and excessive carbohydrate consumption must rank first place as dietary culprits, and are frequently ignored by those agencies who dispense public dietary advice, while vilifying the much needed healthy dietary saturated fats.

The false perception, that dietary saturated fats are a health risk, ignores their vital role in maintaining healthy cell membranes, bone protection, immune support, energy supply and unwanted weight loss !

This popular perception is rooted in poor science, and has resulted in the unwarranted demonization of an essential component of a healthy diet, as reflected by the continuing vilification of saturated fat by government health bodies, the popular media, and even sections of the medical media.

Current proposals to tax saturated fats is misguided, retrogressive, and morally questionable, and attempts to raise state revenue by this method must be avoided in the best health interests of our nation.

Dr. Neville Wilson,
The Leinster Clinic,
Kilcock Road,
Maynooth.

POOR TED, YOUR CHOLESTEROL IS TOO LOW !

“Ted 70, loves paintball. A month ago his cholesterol was 5.1. It’s well below that now “

So reads the announcement in an advert which proudly promotes the cholesterol lowering power of it’s popular dietary product. (Sunday Independent 1 July, 2012.)

Having reportedly consumed the widely marketed plant sterol containing product in question, Ted now proudly parades a placard which boasts the magic figure  of 4.6.

Ted has lowered his cholesterol from 5.1 to 4.6, and has likely been informed that his risk of having a heart attack has been reduced, and his chances of living longer have been markedly improved.

I am genuinely concerned about Ted, and wonder if anyone has ever told him how important his cholesterol is for health and survival, and how essential it’s role is in normalizing his brain function, stabilizing the millions of cell membranes in his body, and providing essential protection against a host of bacterial infections to which the elderly are susceptible.

I am concerned that Ted may be labouring under the false hope of having an extended life because of his lowered cholesterol !

And, I wonder if anyone has ever told Ted that all the heart health  expectations, generated by  high powered marketing strategies, aimed at lowering cholesterol levels in healthy people, are entirely without a shred of scientific evidence ?

Like many of his contemporaries, Ted may well be deluded into believing that cholesterol is his enemy, and that it’s level in his blood should be reduced at all costs, and by any means.

There are many sound clinical studies which show clearly that high cholesterol in older folks is a friend and not a foe, and a predictor of longevity, rather than mortality !

In other words, older people, like Ted, are more likely to live longer if their blood levels of cholesterol are higher, rather than lower !

One study in 2010 showed that total cholesterol levels below 5.5 in people of  Ted’s generation shortened their lives significantly, while another study in 2006, looking at over 30,000 patients in 81 acute care units, found that hospitalized patients over the age of 65 recovered faster if their cholesterol levels were high.

Two separate studies reported in the Lancet in 1997 showed that for every INCREASE in total cholesterol by 1 mMol/L there was  a corresponding DECREASE of 15% in mortality.

So, Ted could be in trouble !

The placard he proudly holds tells us that his cholesterol levels have dropped, and may even drop further if he continues to consume the advertised product.

The advert boldly states that plant sterols will lower your cholesterol, and emphasises that “this is a fact”, but the true facts have been reported in the scientific studies quoted above, which highlight the dangers of Ted unnecessarily and unnaturally lowering his cholesterol.

Tragically, the true facts are clouded by the marketing hype of the food and drug industries,  and by a poor understanding of how cholesterol exerts its protective benefits,  by the many practicing health professionals who continue to induce an unwarranted fear in the minds of otherwise healthy people.

In a 1992 review of 19 large scale studies, in which the cause of death was assessed, Dr. David Jacob found that low cholesterol predicted an increased risk of dying from gastrointestinal and respiratory infections.

But not only is the unnecessary and artificial lowering of blood cholesterol a health concern.

The methods used may also be a real source of concern.

Many people have been turned away from eating animal products because of the unwarranted fear of cholesterol ingestion, and have been enticed to consume plant sterols as alternatives, in the form of margarines, spreads, yoghurts and other products.

Unlike human cholesterol, plant sterols are not synthesized in the human body, and are thus not essential to health. When ingested, they compete with dietary cholesterol and inhibit the absorption of cholesterol, thereby reducing the natural levels of circulating cholesterol throughout the body.

Because plant sterols significantly lower LDL-cholesterol they have attracted the attention of the food and drug industry, with research efforts aimed at using plant sterols as a therapeutic agent. Numerous studies have successfully tested the reductions of  LDL-C  with dietary phytosterols, but have not succeeded in demonstrating cardiovascular benefit by so doing.

In other words, lowering cholesterol has not produced the anticipated benefit of protection against a heart attack or stroke or premature death, and consuming plant sterols may, in some cases,  actually increase the risk of such events.

Several studies have shown that  high levels of ingested plant sterols could produce a condition known as sitosterolaemia, associated with increased risk for lethal atherosclerosis.

In one very large well known study (4S) a subgroup having the highest levels of plant sterols also had the highest risk of recurrent coronary disease, despite having lower levels of cholesterol as a result of statin use.

In a German study researchers showed an increase in plaque formation and atherosclerosis lesions with commercially provided dietary plant sterols.

The widely held conventional view that high cholesterol levels are associated with increased risk of dying is not based on scientific evidence, and serves only to heighten anxiety unnecessarily, with far greater consequences for health than a harmless elevation of cholesterol numbers.

In summary, resorting to dietary plant sterols for cholesterol reduction, not only has no scientifically proven health benefit, but may also increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and an unwanted heart attack.

My advice to Ted, based on solid science, is to be less concerned about his cholesterol numbers, and more concerned about a healthy lifestyle, and to be wary about the excessive consumption of products that offer no guarantee for a long or a healthy life.

 

Dr. Neville Wilson,

Medical Director.

The Leinster Clinic,

Maynooth.

 

Tel: 01-5052135.

FLUORIDE POLICY IN QUESTION

The Fluoride dilemma is not new, and continues to prompt calls to action from concerned bodies who challenge the Government’s pursuit of a policy which has questionable benefits and documented  risks to health.

Public water fluoridation was introduced intoIrelandin July 1964, on the grounds of  being a low cost public health measure, considered to be safe to human health, and of benefit to all sections of society, and not restricted by social boundaries.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) reports that over 200 million people in 39 countries benefit from artificially fluoridated drinking water.

Dental Health surveys in Ireland, conducted by the State in 1963, 1984, 1989, and 1990 concluded that water fluoridation provided a protective benefit in children at risk of tooth decay.

The widespread availability of refined sugars and it’s negative impact on dental health, which initially prompted the introduction of fluoridation in 1964, continues to present a public health hazard for Irish children and teenagers.

At a level of 1 part per million (1.0 ppm) in drinking water, fluoride was considered to be safe and effective as a protective mechanism against acid attack and tooth decay, a conclusion supported by the WHO, and also the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland.

Currently, 73% of the Irish population have fluoridated water supplies, which contain levels within the range of 0.8 ppm and 1.0 ppm.  The EU directive for drinking water is 1.5 ppm fluoride.

A review by the Irish Expert Body (IEB) of the EPA standards (USA) in 2008 did not evaluate the risks / benefits for levels of water fluoride concentration between 0.7 mg/l and 1.2 mg/l. Their view is that fluoridation is safe and effective, and that current policy benefits overall health.

The Irish Dentists Opposing Fluoridation (IDOF) oppose these views on several grounds, including the strong links between fluoridation and several serious health conditions.

Apart from the ethical problems (http://drnevillewilson.com/2008/07/28/the-fluoride-policy/) associated with state sanctioned mass medication, health authorities are obliged to give public assurances that  hydrofluorosilicic acid  in Irish drinking water is below toxic levels, and that such water has passed the requirements of the Codified Pharmaceutical Directive 2001/83/EEC.

Given that fluoride in public water is no longer sourced from the waste products of the fertiliser and aluminium industry, and is instead imported from the Netherlands, are details of it’s source a matter of public knowledge ?

The recent imposition of state control over certain foods and nutrients which forbid them to make health claims must surely also apply to a chemical added to public drinking water for “preventative” purposes and as an aid to health.

Does this, by definition, not make fluoridated water a “medical supplement” that is being illegally used and in urgent need of control ?

The recent requests by the Kerry County Council and Bandon and Kinsale Town Councils to have water fluoridation policy reviewed is timely and appropriate, given the lack of evidence for non-toxicity and the acclaimed health benefits of adding fluoride to Irish public water.

Dr. Neville Wilson,

Medical Director,

TheLeinsterClinic.

Maynooth.

Problems with Fluoride

A letter to the Irish Times

Sir, – The Irish Expert Body (IEB) on water fluoridation bases its current policy on presumptions of safety at public water levels of 0.6-0.8 milligrams/litre. This perception fails to account for the fact that a lifelong ingestion of public fluoridated water, in addition to it’s ubiquitous presence in widely consumed commercial foods, like beverages, teas, ice-creams and soy products, may give rise to levels that exceed optimum safety, and thereby raise the risk of toxic effects involving skeletal structures, thyroid tissue, reproductive organs and neurological systems in adults and children.

The US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry lists fluoride as among the top 20 of 275 substances that pose the most significant threat to human health, a statement that raises serious questions about current assertions regarding fluoride safety and overall health benefits.

The recently published Harvard study has prompted researchers to concede the possibility of adverse effects of fluoride exposure on children’s neuro-development.

The IEB is now challenged to refute these findings and their implications for the future health of Irish children.

 

Dr NEVILLE WILSON,

Medical Director.

The Leinster Clinic,

Maynooth,

Co Kildare.

PLAN TO BAN CHEESE IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER

A LETTER IN THE IRISH EXAMINER -  Tues May 15, 2012.

The draft code proposal by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland, to ban the advertising of cheese on children’s television programmes, is a recipe for disaster, and represents the predictable consequences of anti-fat lobbying by senior HSE dieticians.

The “Health Statement”, a special report in the Irish Times (Oct 11, 2011) featured the collective opinions of several spokespersons in the Health industry, who, repeatedly and consistently, warned that “high fat” foods are the cause of our national health crisis.

Maeve Cormody is on record as condemning the use of butter and cheese because they are “high in cholesterol and increase the risk of heart attack “

Another dietician stated that the marketing of unhealthy food to Irish children “undermines the national health eating guidelines and the Food Pyramid”.

Undermining the traditional Food Pyramid is the very best thing that we can do in the health interests of our children, as it’s preferential recommendation of carbohydrates will encourage the very foods that promote insulin surges, diabetes and obesity.

The traditional Food Pyramid should accordingly be removed from all schools and institutions where it has long served as a dietary guide to young people.

 

 

Despite all the aggressive anti-cholesterol propaganda on TV and radio, neither cholesterol nor saturated fats are the proven culprits in heart disease or obesity !

Current dietary guidelines in respect of saturated fat restriction reflects the very dubious American Heart Association (AHA) dietary recommendations which have unfortunately influenced the food, nutrition and biomedical communities worldwide.

My evidence based rebuttal of these anti-fat and anti-cholesterol statements was not published following their submission.

The Danish policy of taxing dairy products, and dietary saturated fats, is not rooted in in good science, and is thus misguided, retrogressive and contrary to the best health interests of its population.

If Ireland is to pursue a similar policy, falling prey to the politically-correct rhetoric of the anti-fat lobby, it will have failed it’s entire populace by endorsing the unhealthy alternatives to heart healthy dietary fats.

The avoidance of nutrient dense saturated fats (milk, butter, cheese, eggs, animal meat) seriously compromises the dietary absorption of fat soluble vitamins A,D,E & K,  with dire consequences for health.

An open debate on these critical issues is long overdue.

Dr. Neville Wilson.
Medical Director,
TheLeinsterClinic,
Maynooth.